Danish vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Danish
Maltese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Danes
Maltese
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,459,007 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 0.080%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Maltese |
Minimum | 0.79% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.5% |
Range | 99.2% | 79.3% |
Mean | 23.1% | 18.7% |
Median | 14.1% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 22.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |