Osage vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Chinese
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,772,722 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 49.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 24.4% | 19.1% |
| Range | 23.6% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 6.8% |
| Median | 9.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and American (9.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |