Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,782,180 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 30.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 19.1% |
| Range | 25.3% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Sri Lankan (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |