Serbian vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Chinese
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,119,010 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 22.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Serbian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 19.1% |
| Range | 31.2% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 6.8% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Serbians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from England (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Asia (7.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |