PRELIMINARES
PRELIMINARES
PRELIMINARES
PRESENTADO POR:
ASESORADO POR:
Salman, Cristina.
iv
AGRADECIMIENTOS
investigación.
Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín, por los docentes, quienes me formaron con
desarrollo profesional.
v
Salman, Cristina. Análisis del Impuesto a los Grandes Patrimonios en
la legislación venezolana. Universidad Privada Dr. Rafael Belloso
Chacín. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Jurídicas. Escuela de
derecho. Maracaibo, 2020.
RESUMEN
vi
Salman, Cristina. Analysis of the Tax on Large Assets in Venezuelan
legislation. Universidad Privada Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín. Facultad
de Ciencias Políticas y Jurídicas. Escuela de derecho. Maracaibo,
2020.
ABSTRACT
The objective of this research was to analyze the Tax on Large Assets in
Venezuelan legislation, which is based on the Constitution of the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (1999), Constitutional Law that creates
the Tax on Large Assets (2019), Code Organic Tax (2014), Civil Code
(1982), among others and in the doctrine of authors such as: Moya (2003),
Fraga (2006), González (1996) among others. The type of investigation
was documentary. The study population was made up of laws and
doctrines related to research. The observation technique used for this
investigation was documentary in nature, since a review and analysis of
documentary and bibliographic sources was carried out. The instrument
consisted of a document observation guide. The content was validated by
the Academic Committee of the Faculty of Political and Legal Sciences of
the Private University Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín. Thus, the results show
that the Tax on Large Assets is a tax created by an illegitimate National
Constituent Assembly whose tax is based on the value of the accounting
assets of special taxpayers, thus generating a reduction in constitutional
principles, since it is appropriate of an entity that has no legal power to
legislate.
vii
ÍNDICE GENERAL
Pág
CAPÍTULO I. EL PROBLEMA
1. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA .................................................... 4
2. OBJETIVOS DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN................................................... 8
2.1. OBJETIVO GENERAL .................................................................. 8
2.2. OBJETIVOS ESPECIFICOS ......................................................... 8
3. JUSTIFICACIÓN .................................................................................... 8
4. DELIMITACIÓN ..................................................................................... 9
viii
2.1.2.5. LEGITIMIDAD......................................................... 25
2.1.2.6. PRECARIEDAD ...................................................... 26
2.1.3. PRINCIPIOS CONSTITUCIONALES .................................... 27
2.1.3.1. PRINCIPIO DE LEGALIDAD .................................. 28
2.1.3.2. PRINCIPIO DE CAPACIDAD CONTRIBUTIVA ..... 29
2.1.3.3. PRINCIPIO DE JUSTICIA TRIBUTARIA ................ 31
2.1.2.4. PRINCIPIO DE NO CONFISCATORIEDAD .......... 33
2.1.2.5. PRINCIPIO DE PROGRESIVIDAD ........................ 34
3. SISTEMA DE CATEGORÍAS ............................................................... 35
3.1. DEFINICIÓN NOMINAL ............................................................... 35
3.2. DEFINICIÓN CONCEPTUAL....................................................... 36
3.3. DEFINICIÓN OPERACIONAL ..................................................... 36
CONCLUSIONES .................................................................................... 57
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS ....................................................... 59
ANEXOS .................................................................................................. 63
(A) INSTRUMENTO DE VALIDEZ DEL CONTENIDO ............................ 64
ix
ÍNDICE DE CUADROS
CUADRO Pág.
x
INTRODUCCIÓN
aquellas personas cuyo ingresos son bajos pero con activos de alto valor