Triple Pier - Pile IRC 112
Triple Pier - Pile IRC 112
Triple Pier - Pile IRC 112
From Km 323/850 to Km 377/872 in the state of Tamilnadu Design of Triple column Pier
Bridge at KM
1. Introduction :-
Design of Triple column pier and Pile foundation is presented in the following pages.
The Pier comprises of Solid Circular column of 3 nos with Capping beam R.C.C
construction. The foundation comprises of R.C.C solid pile cap supported on R.C.C Bored
cast-in-situ piles.
3. Design Parameters:-
The design parameters shall be as follows:-
Input data's:
Sl. No Description
12 Number of piles 6
404
Normal Seismic
31 Stress in steel - N /mm 2
348 521.7391
1500
298.492
750 750
HFL - 295.000
1750 3500 3500 1750
5.4960
1500
650
287.500
1.8
285.700
10000 (Square)
Section A-A
2.6 m
2.00 m Dia
287.500
1.8 m
285.700
Section B-B
5200
1400
3600
1200 mm dia
10000
3600
1400
Note:
Sq: Length in square direction
Sk: Length in skew direction
300
187.5 150
150 x )H(
150 x )H( 150x )H( 37.5 (V) 150 x )H( 37.5 (V) 37.5 )V(
37.5 (V)
700 mm 1912.5 1800 2400mm
mm
300
1625 350 300 350 2000 350 300 350 2000 350 350 1625
300
DONT TAKE
2
300 6 300
150 225 0 150
350 (H) x
75 (V) 350 x )H( 75 (V) 350 (H) x 75 (V) 350 x )H(
300 75 )V(
1375 m 1800
200 2400 mm
200
300
700
2125 3000 3000 2125
400
700 300
300 300
250
350
325
300 (H) x 300 (H) x
100 (V) 150 (H) x 75 (V) 150 (H) x 75 (V) 150 (H) x 75 (V) 100 (V)
1.45 m
1.775 2.375
625
End Section
1137.5 450 325 300 300 300 300 300 300 450
2075 325 2075 325 2075 325 1137.5
250
400
300 (H) x 150 (V) 300 (H) x 150 (V) 450 (H) x
450 (H) x 300 (H) x 150 (V) 150 (V)
150 (V) 325 1.3 2.675 m 1.45 m
200 2.1
200 625 150 m
250
1750 3000 3000 3000
1750
Mid Section
1050 11430
300
300
625 325
Sectional Plan
Note: All dimensions are in mm unless otherwise noted.
i) Class A - 2 lane:-
RB = 155.27 KN RA = 344.73 KN
fh / support = 100.00 / 2 = 50 KN
HL = 50.00 KN
= 17.78 KN
0.75 8.500
0.5 m 3.55 0.5
5.125 m
ii) 70 R wheeled: -
HL = 100 KN
= 35.56 KN
4.57 m
5 700 KN
2.285 m 2.285 m
2
1.925 m
0 0.36 17.24 m 0.36
RA RB
fh / support = 140 / 2= 70 KN
HL = 70 KN.m
= 24.89 KN
i) Class - A -2 lane:-
68 68 68 68 114
3.12 3 3 3 4.3 1.20
HL = 55.4 KN
Vertical reaction on first span= 0.2 x 500 x 1.2 + 0.065 + 1.8 = 17.78
17.24
17.78
Net force
ii). 70 R Wheeled:-
HL = 100 KN
Vertical reaction first span: = 0.2 x 680 x 1.2 + 0.065 + 1.8 = 24.18
17.24
Vertical reaction on second span = 0.2 x 320 x 1.2 + 0.065 + 1.8 = 11.38
17.24
Moment due to vertical reaction = 580.80 - 251.51 + 12.80 x 0.380 = 129.99 KN.m
iii) 70 R tracked:
4.57
2.285 m
4.57
RB = RC = 334.52 KN
Vertical reaction on first span = Second span = 0.2 x 350 x 1.2 + 0.065 + 1.8
17.24
HL = 70 KN
114 27 27
3.20 1.1 13.32
KN
KN
1.92
KN.m
= 251.51 KN
KN
KN
11.38
700
4.57
2.285
= 12.44 KN
= 692.72 KN / support
Input for loads from superstructure for 29m span 29m span
Total Dead Load of Girders and slab = 1072.59 + 692.72 + 96.755 = 277.2 KN / support
1100
Crash barrier:-
Area = 0.309 m 2
= 0.309 x 25 = 7.73 KN / m
Wearing coat:
Taking live load as. 404 Kg/m2 as per clause 206 . 1 of IRC : 6 - 2014
Total Super Imposed Dead Load = 0+ 224.17 + 196.98 + 174 + 91.785 = 687 KN / support
Class A vehicles:
Case (i) Minimum edge distance from left side
W1 W2 W3 W4
0.4 1.8 1.7 1.8
0.5 0.750
1.5
W1 W2 W3 W4
4.55 1.8 1.7 1.8 0.4
0.5 0.750
1.5
Class A-2 lane concentric with girder position will not place on the deck because the minimum edge
distance is not satisfied.
0.5 0.5
W1 W2 W3 W4
1.8 1.7 1.8
0.5
1.5
0.5
4.310
W1 W2
1.630 1.93
1.5 0.75
0.5
1.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.75
0.5
5.465
W1 W2
1.93
1.5 0.75
0.5
1.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.75
0.5
8.620
W1 W2
1.93 1.630 0.5
1.5 0.75
0.5
1.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.75
0.5
4.400
W1 W2
1.620 2.03
1.5 0.75
0.5
1.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.75
0.5
`
5.515
W1 W2
2.03
.
0.5 1.5
2.125 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.125
0.5
9.005 W1 W2
.
0.2 1.5
2.125 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.125
8.28 CG
A B C D
9.09 CG
A B C D
8.28 CG
A B C D
9.09 CG
A B C D
The above loads are split for different ULS factors for wearing coat and CB, DL etc
Load on each bearing is below 29m spam 29m spam
girder weight = 37.3 T 37.3 T
Deck slab = 28.32031 T 28.3203 T
Wearing Coat only (65mm) = 6.8875 T 4.92456 T All Bearing loaded
Crash barrier and railing = 36.25 T 44.1018 T
C Class 70R Wheeled For 29m spam For 2 span load case
Maximum Reaction at 1 end of abutment = 72.55 T 18.1831 T
Transverse Ecc of Cl 70R Wheeled Vehicle from CL of superstr. 3.155 m 3.155 m
Transverse Moment = 228.8953 Tm 57.3675 Tm
C Class 70R Tracked For 29m spam For 2 span load case
Maximum Reaction at 1 end of abutment = 64.20471 T 5T
Transverse Ecc of Cl 70R tracked Vehicle from CL of superstr. 3.1 m 3.1 m
Transverse Moment = 199.0346 Tm 15.5 Tm
For 1 span load case
For 29m Span B1 B2 B3 B4
E dist from CG 4.5 1.5 -1.5 -4.5 45
F Effect of Class A1 span 26.80 15.36 3.92 -7.52
Effect of Class A1 span 40.10 26.22 12.34 -1.54
Effect of 70R Wheel load 41.03 25.77 10.51 -4.75
Effect of 70R Track load 35.95 22.69 9.42 -3.85
C Class 70R Wheeled For 29m spam For 2 span load case
Maximum Reaction at 1 end of abutment = 72.55 T 18.1831 T
Transverse Ecc of Cl 70R Wheeled Vehicle from CL of superstr. 1.155 m 1.155 m
Transverse Moment = 83.79525 Tm 21.0014 Tm
C Class 70R Tracked For 29m spam For 2 span load case
Maximum Reaction at 1 end of abutment = 64.20471 T 5T
Transverse Ecc of Cl 70R tracked Vehicle from CL of superstr. 1.115 m 1.115 m
Transverse Moment = 71.58825 Tm 5.575 Tm
For 1 span load case
For 29m Span B1 B2 B3 B4
E dist from CG 4.5 1.5 -1.5 -4.5 45
8 Seismic
Total Load from Superstr = 326.28 T
Total Foot path Live load = 18.357 T
Seismic Force over top of superstructure 82.71288 T 20.67822 T over Each Bearing
Check for vertical seismic forces 55.14192 T 13.78548 T over Each Bearing
4 - laning of Coimbatore-Mettupalayam section of NH-67 Draft Detailed Project Report
From Km 323/850 to Km 377/872 in the state of Tamilnadu Design of Triple column Pier
LOAD CALCULATIONS:
STAAD OUTPUT
Node No.36 Node No.53 Node No.70 Node No.50 Node No.67 Node No.84
S.No Description (R1) KN (R1) KN (R1) KN (R1) KN (R1) KN (R1) KN
DONT TAKE
2 Super imposed DL 501.64 0 139.38 0 86.34 0
3 Footpath Live load 666.28 0 33.24 0 -136.30 0
70 R Wheeled
1 Minimum Edge distance from Left Side 220.14 503.13 125.77 849.04
2 Concentric with Deck 169.58 509.58 169.89 849.05
3 Minimum Edge distance from Right Side -24.39 316.88 556.55 849.04
70 R Tracked
1 Minimum Edge distance from Left Side 284.48 408.91 -12.92 680.47
3 Minimum Edge distance from Right Side 1.21 462.22 217.03 680.46
1 Minimum Edge distance from Left Side 205.94 366.67 254.60 827.21
2 Minimum Edge distance from Right Side 45.13 287.14 494.94 827.21
R1 R2 R3
700
R4 R5 R6
(ii) Seismic Case:- (For Zone - III as per cl - 219 of IRC : 6-2014)
II) Response spectrum method: (As per CL. 219 of IRC: 6 - 2014)
Z Sa
Horizontal seismic coefficient αh = 2 g I
T = Fundamental period of the bridge member (in sec) for horizontal vibrations
(Refer Appendix - 2)
#REF!
T = 2 D
(sec.) 1000 F
Horizontal force in KN required to be applied at the centre of mass of the superstructure for 1 mm horizontal
F =
deflection at the top of pier / abutment along the considered direction of horizontal force
Ah = 0.16
2 x 2.5 x 1.2 = 0.24 = 0.24
Av = 0.24 2 = 0.160
3
ii) Live load (For seismic case only 20% load to be considered) = 169.808 KN
Braking Force:-
70R wheeled loading case goverm the design, it acts at 1.20m above road level,
790
Extra load on Pier = = 29.48 KN
26.8
29.48
Load / Bearing = = 7.37 KN
4
Secondary effects:-
As per IRC:6-C1.217 shrinkage effects for the purpose of design may be taken as = 2x10-4
Temperature variations = 17 °C
= 2.665 mm
Change in length due to shrinkage & Creep = 4.575 x 0.0001 + 2 x 0.0001 x 26.8 x 1000
2
= 8.81 mm
No. of bearings = 4
= 7.65 = 76.5 KN
Velocity along longitudinal axis at HFL (along = 4.005 x 0.34 = 1.4 m/sec
Traffic)
7.5 m
Top of Pilecap
287.500
7.500 m
1.8 m
Ft acts at
Ft acts at 15.6 m from pile cap bottom
Wind on Abutment m
Wind force Horizontal 2.443 0.610658 T
Moment at top of pile 5.496 13.425 3.356175 TM
Moment at base of foundn 7.296 17.821 4.455359 TM
Wind on LL FT FL
Wind force Horizontal m 70.461 17.615
Moment at top of pile 8.193 577.283 144.3207 Tm
Moment at base of foundn 15.6 1099.184 274.796 Tm
WIND LOAD CALCULATION AS PER IRC: 6- 2014 CL.209 (Wind Leading Force Case)
Ft acts at
Ft acts at 15.6 m from pile cap bottom
Wind on Abutment m
Wind force Horizontal 2.443 0.610658 T
Moment at top of pile 5.496 13.425 3.356175 TM
Moment at base of foundn 7.296 17.821 4.455359 TM
Wind on LL FT FL
Wind force Horizontal m 0.000 0.000
Moment at top of pile 8.193 0.000 0 Tm
Moment at base of foundn 15.6 0.000 0 Tm
4 - laning of Coimbatore-Mettupalayam section of NH-67 Draft Detailed Project Report
From Km 323/850 to Km 377/872 in the state of Tamilnadu Design of Triple column Pier
Dry condition :
Wind forces due to dead load as per Cl-212.2 and 212.3 of IRC:6
(I) Wind force on Hand rail and Hand post:
Considering full 1.1m height of hand rail and neglecting the holes between the hand rails
Average height above bed level = Top of deck slab + Thichness of kerb +
Height of Hand rail / 2 - Bed level
Exposed area of hand rail, hand post and ke = (Hand rail + kerb ) x 10
= 0.275 + 1.1 x 29 = 39.875 m2
Total force on hand rail and hand post = 1.10 x 39.875 = 43.74 KN
= 0.966 Kn / m 2
= 136.06 + 45.66
(ii) Calculated as per cl.212.7 = 39.875 + 69.6 + 3.9 x 2.4 = 272.1 > 130.5
From Pier:-
Size of pier = 2
Straight Height of Pier =
Area circular =
Total Volume =
Total Load =
4 - laning of Coimbatore-Mettupalayam section of NH-67 Draft Detailed Project Report
From Km 323/850 to Km 377/872 in the state of Tamilnadu Design of Triple column Pier
m = 10
Grade of concrete = 35
Max 50 3239.21 952.20 -703.92 1184.140 0.000 0.000 1184.140 15.52 267
One Span
Min 45 2958.30 952.20 -674.44 1166.855 0.000 0.000 1166.855 15.52 267
DRY
Max 53 3311.67 881.81 -703.92 1128.318 0.001 0.001 1128.319 15.52 267
Two Span
Min 48 2987.08 857.14 -673.44 1090.046 -15.370 -18.137 1071.909 15.52 267
Max 62 3758.77 3549.70 -373.97 3569.348 0.000 0.000 3569.348 8.50 107.72 17.51 300
One Span
Min 57 3477.85 3549.70 -344.49 3566.379 0.000 0.000 3566.379 8.70 119.10 17.51 300
SEISMIC
Max 65 3831.22 3479.32 -373.97 3499.359 0.001 0.001 3499.360 8.22 99.88 17.51 300
Two Span
Min 60 3506.63 3454.64 -343.48 3471.676 -15.370 -18.137 3453.539 8.30 109.51 17.51 300
13 Max 27 1737.45 942.43 -208.50 965.223 -2.570 -3.033 962.190 11.67 200
One Span
Min 19 1534.71 942.43 -191.41 961.676 -7.523 -8.877 952.799 11.67 200
NORMAL
Max 30 1762.98 828.00 -210.02 854.223 -22.167 -26.157 828.066 11.67 200
Two Span
Min 22 1518.33 808.40 -192.46 830.997 -4.014 -4.737 826.260 11.67 200
Max 39 1917.52 942.43 -891.27 1297.129 -7.523 -8.877 1288.252 15.52 267
One Span
Min 31 1714.78 942.43 -874.18 1285.446 -7.523 -8.877 1276.569 15.52 267
WET
Max 42 1943.06 828.00 -892.79 1217.645 -22.167 -26.157 1191.488 15.52 267
Two Span
Min 34 1698.40 808.40 -875.22 1191.442 -4.014 -4.737 1186.705 15.52 267
Max 50 1651.03 942.43 -862.06 1277.235 -7.523 -8.877 1268.358 15.52 267
One Span
Min 43 1722.48 942.43 -848.39 1268.047 -7.523 -8.877 1259.170 15.52 267
DRY
Max 54 1950.75 828.00 -867.00 1198.861 -22.167 -26.157 1172.704 15.52 267
Two Span
Min 46 1706.10 808.40 -849.43 1172.625 -4.014 -4.737 1167.888 15.52 267
Max 62 1603.54 3513.30 -459.08 3543.166 -28.045 -33.093 3510.073 9.62 207.80 17.51 300
One Span
Min 55 1674.99 3513.30 -445.41 3541.420 -28.045 -33.093 3508.327 9.60 203.65 17.51 300
SEISMIC
Max 66 1903.26 3398.87 -464.02 3430.396 -42.690 -50.374 3380.022 9.10 180.50 17.51 300
Two Span
Min 58 1658.61 3379.27 -446.45 3408.634 -24.536 -28.952 3379.682 9.21 193.70 17.51 300
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1.75 1.75
5.496 7 9 11
10.992 8 9 10
9.125
5.496 8 10 12
11 12 13
Grade of concrete = 35
T = 5 EI = 315000 x 1E+07
= 303.51 cm = 3.035 m
K1 5 1.245
L1 = 3.177
= 1.047
T 3.035
Hence O.K
Notatio
Description n Layer1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Remarks
Effective depth of layers h 4.00 3.00 6.50
Density of soil t/m3 g 1.8 1.8 1.8
Ave. N value N 12 23 45
Angle of internal friction f 30.5 34.5 40 Fig 1 of IS:6403
Angle of wall friction bet soil
& pile d 30.5 34.5 40
tan d 0.589 0.687 0.839
Coefficent of earth pr. k 1.5 1.5 1.5
D = Stem diameter
= 5.68 m
STAAD RESULTS
= 1904.04 KN
1400
1800
3600
1200 mm dia pile
10000
3600
1400
ZL = 2 x 3 x 1.8 2 = 10.80
1.8
Self weight of pile upto fixity level = 3.1416 x 5.918 x 5.918 x 1.2 x 1.2
4
= 39.61 KN
V/n+
P= P1+P2
self wt of
P1 (KN) ML MT Pmax Pmin MH per
Load Combination HT (KN) HL (KN) ML (Kn.m) MT (Kn.m) pile
(KN) HR= HL2+HT2 ZL ZT Pille
(KN)
Normal Case
i) Comb: 1 7393.98 9298.02 -0.039 260.641 260.64 2837.067 -16.77 1589.28 262.69 -1.16 1850.81 1327.75 257.08
ii) Comb: 2 6210.99 8115.03 0.08 260.641 260.64 2837.067 5.75 1392.11 262.69 0.40 1655.20 1129.02 257.08
iii) Comb: 3 7481.41 9385.45 -0.024 270.929 270.93 2520.369 -17.16 1603.85 233.37 -1.19 1836.03 1371.67 267.23
iv) Comb: 4 6213.51 8117.55 0.06 250.559 250.56 2480.448 6.76 1392.54 229.67 0.47 1622.68 1162.40 247.14
Wind Case
ix) Comb: 9 7119.79 9023.83 321.017 260.641 413.5 2837.07 -2005.27 1543.58 262.69 -139.26 1667.02 1420.15 257.08
x) Comb: 10 6210.99 8115.03 321.076 260.641 413.55 2837.067 -1986.17 1392.11 262.69 -137.93 1516.88 1267.35 257.08
xi) Comb: 11 7481.41 9385.45 320.976 270.929 420.03 2520.37 -2009.08 1603.85 233.37 -139.52 1697.70 1510.00 267.23
xii) Comb: 12 6213.51 8117.55 321.06 250.559 407.26 2480.448 -1985.16 1392.54 229.67 -137.86 1484.35 1300.72 247.135
Seismic Case
xiii) Comb: 13 7863.05 9767.09 193.15 971.639 990.65 10576.30 -837.03 1667.46 979.29 -58.13 2588.62 746.30 958.360
xiv) Comb: 14 6954.25 8858.29 193.21 971.639 990.66 10576.302 -817.93 1515.99 979.29 -56.80 2438.48 593.50 958.360
xv) Comb: 15 8224.67 10128.71 193.11 981.929 1000.74 10259.61 -840.84 1727.73 949.96 -58.39 2619.30 836.16 968.509
xvi) Comb: 16 6956.77 8860.81 193.19 961.558 980.77 10219.685 -816.92 1516.41 946.27 -56.73 2405.95 626.87 948.417
m = 10
Grade of concrete = 35
Permissible Stress
Actual Stress (N/mm 2)
(N/mm 2)
S.No Case V (kN) MH (kN.m)
Concrete Steel Concrete Steel
1 Normal
3 Wind
Note: Permissible stresses of concrete & steel has been increased 50% for
the seismic case as per table 1 of IRC:6-2000.
Q = Y x 12 x E x I (Refer IS - 2911)
(L1 + Lf) 3
= 25.57 t
Normal case :
Wind case :
Seismic case :
The critical section for the bending moment is the face of pier wall.
Z
2000 mm dia Cos 39 = 0.777
Distribution steel:-
0.9755 0.849
B C B A
A
1.400 3.600 3.600 1.400
10.000
= 1554.83 Kn
Ast for Upward Moment = 3129.31 X 10 6 = #DIV/0! mm2 > 2160 mm2
348 x 0x 1712.5 x 5.2
Ast for Downward Moment = 92.07 X 10 6 = #DIV/0! mm2 > 2160 mm2
348 x 0x 1712.5 x 5.2
Distribution steel:
Maximum permissible shear stress = 2.3 = 1.15 N / mm2 > 0.137 N / mm2
2
Hence O.K
The critical section for the bending moment is the face of pier wall.
Ah = 0.24
Av =
Z
0.16
2000 mm dia
Cos 0 = 1
0.9755 0.849
B C B A
A
1.400 3.600 3.600 1.400
10.000
= 1693.28 Kn
Ast for Upward Moment = 3587.26 X 10 6 = #DIV/0! mm2 > 2160 mm2
522 x 0x 1712.5 x 5.2
Distribution steel:
Maximum permissible shear stress = 2.3 = 1.15 N / mm2 > 0.152 N / mm2
2
Hence O.K
Pier cap
2600 x 1500
2600
2600
600 700
450
1500 -7
593
707
Line of 2000 Dia
inscribed square
Cantilever length of pier cap from the face of pier in square direction = 593 mm
ii) B.M due to self weight of pedestal = 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.75 x -0.007 x 25
= -0.11 Kn.m
iii) B.M due to self weight of super structure= 2456.9 x -0.007 = -17.2 Kn.m
iv) B.M due to Super imposed Dead Load = 363.68 x -0.007 = -2.55 Kn.m
Drequired = 18.38 x 10 6
13.4 x 10500
Dprovided = 1500 - 50 - 10
= 1440 mm
STAAD RESULTS :
Cantilever Slab
i) Maximum cantilever moment ( @ Node no:5 ) = 1369.97 Kn.m
Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement (as per table 12B of IRC:21-2000)
Pier cap
2600 x 1500
2600
2600
600 700
450
1500 -7
593
707
Line of 2000 Dia
inscribed square
Cantilever length of pier cap from the face of pier in square direction = 593 mm
ii) B.M due to self weight of pedestal = 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.75 x -0.007 x 25
= -0.11 Kn.m
iii) B.M due to self weight of super structure= 2456.9 x -0.007 = -17.2 Kn.m
iv) B.M due to Super imposed Dead Load = 363.68 x -0.007 = -2.55 Kn.m
vi) B.M due to Seismic force (Total vertical = 632.20 x -0.007 = -4.43 Kn.m
load due to D.L and L.L)
Drequired = 13.95 x 10 6
20.1 x 10500
Dprovided = 1500 - 50 - 10
= 1440 mm
Drequired = 39.60 x 10 6
13.4 x 580
Hence O.K
= 0.11 mm2/mm
Center of pile from face = 835 mm Which is within the effective depth
b. Punching shear :-
Distance of Critical section from the centre of pile = 1200 + 1713 = 1456.25 mm
2 2
As per clause 307.2.5.5 of IRC : 21 - 2000, the punching shear shall not exceed 0.16 fck
1 PILE
Main reinforcemen= 32 mm rod 20 Nos
Lateral ties - 10 mm @ 150 mm c/c
2 Pile cap
3 Column Pier
Main reinforcement = Provide 32 mm rod 25 Nos
4 Pier cap
5 Tie Beam
1 PILE
Main reinforcement = 32 mm rod 20 Nos
Lateral ties - 8 mm @ 150 mm c/c
2 Pile cap
3 Column Pier
Main reinforcement = Provide 32 mm rod 25 Nos
4 Pier cap
5 Tie Beam