C-2 Marks Devision

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

 Any additional information (Upload)


1.4.2 Feedback process of the Institution may be classified as follows:
QnM Options: 10
A. Feedback collected, analysed and action taken and feedback
available on website
B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken
C. Feedback collected and analysed
D. Feedback collected
E. Feedback not collected

Documents:
Upload Stakeholders feedback report, Action taken report of the institute
on it as stated in the minutes of the Governing Council, Syndicate,
Board of Management

File Description
 Upload any additional information
 URL for feedback report

Criteria 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350)

Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (40)


Metric Weightage
No.
2.1.1. Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)
20
2.1.1.1. Number of students admitted year wise during last five years
2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years
QnM
Data Requirement last five years
 Total number of Students admitted
 Total number of Sanctioned seats

X100

File Description:
 Any additional information
 Institutional data in prescribed format
2.1.2. Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various 20
categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable
QnM reservation policy during the last five years
( exclusive of supernumerary seats)

2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education


51
Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

year wise during last five years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Number of Students admitted from the reserved category
 Total number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per
GOI or State government rule

Formula:

File Description: (Upload)


 Any additional information
 Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved (Data
Template)

Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (50)


Metric Weightage
No.
2.2.1. The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and
organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow 30
learners
QlM Write description in maximum of 500 words

File Description:
 Past link for additional Information
 Upload any additional information
2.2.2. Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed 20
academic year)
Data requirement:
QnM  Total number of Students enrolled in the Institution
 Total number of full time teachers in the Institution
Formula: Students: teachers

File Description (Upload)


 Any additional information
Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (50)
Metric Weightage
No.

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education


52
Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

2.3.1. Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative 20


learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing
learning experiences
QlM
Upload a description in maximum of 500 words

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Link for additional information
2.3.2. Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning 15
process.
QlM
Write description in maximum of 500 words
File Description
 Upload any additional information
 Provide link for webpage describing the ICT enabled tools for
effective teaching-learning process.
2.3.3. Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues 15
(Data for the latest completed academic year )
2.3.3.1. Number of mentors
QnM Number of students assigned to each Mentor

Formula: Mentor : Mentee

File Description
 Upload year wise, number of students enrolled and full time
teachers on roll.
 Circulars pertaining to assigning mentors to mentees
 mentor/mentee ratio

Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60)


Metric Weightage
No.
2.4.1. Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts 20
during the last five years

QnM Data Requirement for last five years (As per Data Template)
 Number of full time teachers
 Number of sanctioned posts

Formula:
Percentage per year =

File Description (Upload)

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education


53
Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

 Year wise full time teachers and sanctioned posts for 5years(Data
Template)
 Any additional information
 List of the faculty members authenticated by the Head of HEI

2.4.2. Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / 20
D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years
(consider only highest degree for count)
QnM

2.4.2.1. Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /


D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five
years

Year
Number

Data Requirement for last five years: (As per Data Template)
 Number of full time teachers with PhD./ D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B
Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt.
 Total number of full time teachers

Formula:

File Description (Upload)


 Any additional information
 List of number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /
D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. and number of full time
teachers for 5 years (Data Template)
2.4.3. Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same 20
institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of
years)
QnM
2.4.3.1: Total experience of full-time teachers
Data Requirement for last five years (As per Data Template)
 Name and Number of full time teachers with years of teaching
experiences
Formula:

File Description: (Upload)


 Any additional information
 List of Teachers including their PAN, designation, dept and

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education


54
Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

experience details(Data Template)

Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (30)


Metric Weight
No. age
2.5.1. Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms 15
of frequency and mode

QlM Upload a description not more than 500 words

File Description:
 Any additional information
 Link for additional information

2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is 15


transparent, time- bound and efficient

Upload a description not more than 500 words


QlM
File Description:
 Any additional information
 Link for additional information

Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (60)


Metric Weight
No. age
2.6.1. Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course 15
outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution.

Describe Course Outcomes (COs) for all courses and mechanism of


QlM communication within a minimum of 500 characters and maximum of
500 words

File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Past link for Additional information
 Upload COs for all courses (exemplars from Glossary)

2.6.2. Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are 15


evaluated by the institution.

Describe the method of measuring the level of attainment of POs , PSOs


QlM and COs in not more than 500
File Description:
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for Additional information

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education


55
Manual for Affiliated/Constituent UG & PG Colleges

2.6.3. Average pass percentage of Students during last five years


2.6.3.1. Total number of final year students who passed the university 30
examination year wise during the last five years

QnM 2.6.3.2. Total number of final year students who appeared for the
university examination year wise during the last five years

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5


Number
of
students
appeare
d
Number
of
students
passes

Data Requirement (As per Data Template)


 Programme code
 Name of the Programme
 Number of Student appeared
 Number of Students passed
 Pass percentage
Formula:

File Description
 Upload list of Programmes and number of students passed and
appeared in the final year examination (Data Template)
 Upload any additional information
 Paste link for the annual report

Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)


Metric Weight
No. age
2.7.1. Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning 60
process.

NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education


56

You might also like