Fijian vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,154,699 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 20.1 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $49,412, a difference of 34.7%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $60,388, a difference of 32.4%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $112,374, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,411, a difference of 6.5%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $64,952, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $41,373, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 99.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 82.6%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.34%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.3%).