Fijian vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,837,489 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 84.7 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $53,265, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $46,941, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,690 compared to $36,823, a difference of 0.36%), median family income ($87,387 compared to $86,989, a difference of 0.46%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $35,307, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.67%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 15.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.42, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.5%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.0%).