Fijian vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,860,196 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.136% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 135.7 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $45,758, a difference of 24.1%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $78,836, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,204, a difference of 0.14%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $80,319, a difference of 0.45%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $37,306, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 71.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 70.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 66.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 63.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 30.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.1%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 230.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 139.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 113.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 31.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 73.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 113.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), disability (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.3%).