Guatemalan vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,139,745 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $47,518, a difference of 8.4%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $48,202, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $35,661, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $82,152, a difference of 0.22%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $88,556, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.7%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.41%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and poverty (15.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.0%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.81%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and college, under 1 year (56.8% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.8%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 5.5%).