Guatemalan vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,218,691 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 12.3 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,961 compared to $67,792, a difference of 12.0%), per capita income ($37,766 compared to $33,921, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $46,417, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $35,063, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $45,566, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $52,509, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 61.3%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 43.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 63.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 63.0%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (42.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 95.5%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and 10th grade (87.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%).