Guatemalan vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guatemalans

Romanians

Poor
Excellent
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Guatemalan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,824,722 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Romanians.
Guatemalan Integration in Romanian Communities

Guatemalan vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $60,063, a difference of 28.5%), per capita income ($37,766 compared to $48,445, a difference of 28.3%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $111,243, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $53,632, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $41,663, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $64,142, a difference of 17.6%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Income
Income MetricGuatemalanRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,766
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,295
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,961
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,205
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,736
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,695
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,525
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,331
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,705
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,526
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Guatemalan vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.5%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.57%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricGuatemalanRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.4%

Guatemalan vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuatemalanRomanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.6%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%

Guatemalan vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuatemalanRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.0%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.2%
Good
83.0%

Guatemalan vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.7%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuatemalanRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.40
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Exceptional
28.7%

Guatemalan vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuatemalanRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
6.2%

Guatemalan vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 94.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricGuatemalanRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.4%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Guatemalan vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 15.7%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.40%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Guatemalan vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricGuatemalanRomanian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Good
11.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%