Pima vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,165,716 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 10.4 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,480, a difference of 45.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,682, a difference of 41.3%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,127, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,802, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $96,866, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 207.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 166.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 134.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 37.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 194.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 127.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 35.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 75.5%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.93%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 119.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 61.5%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 57.5%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 71.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.63%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%).