Burmese vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Turks
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,783,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 48.2% | 22.9% |
| Range | 46.5% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.0% |
| Median | 9.3% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |