South American Indian vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Turks
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
28.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,514,214 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 15.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 68.3% | 22.9% |
| Range | 65.9% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 10.0% |
| Median | 12.5% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.8% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uganda (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iraqi (13.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
| Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |