Ukrainian vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ukrainians
Turks
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,134,896 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.842 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ukrainian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 22.9% |
| Range | 99.6% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 10.0% |
| Median | 13.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.1% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians and Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are German (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |