Ecuadorian vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,004,531 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $76,362, a difference of 22.8%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $66,974, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $45,275, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $54,096, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $35,673, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 47.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 47.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.89%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 100.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 63.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 94.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 85.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.0%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.39%), ged/equivalency (81.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 58.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 7.4%).