Ecuadorian vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,646,948 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 28.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,736, a difference of 14.1%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,499, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,421, a difference of 0.78%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $52,986, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $47,851, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 68.8%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 61.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 40.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.0%), currently married (43.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 234.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 19.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 47.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 110.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.7%).