Ecuadorian vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,305,817 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 5.9 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $45,673, a difference of 18.0%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $75,856, a difference of 8.2%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $55,356, a difference of 0.72%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $93,858, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $49,924, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 31.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 1.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 35.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%), family households (65.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 115.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 56.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 45.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.21%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 3.5%).