Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from West Indies Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,720,559 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from West Indies within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from West Indies. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Immigrants from West Indies.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $88,164, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $77,956, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $54,927, a difference of 0.060%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $39,441, a difference of 0.83%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $43,989, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.30%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.9%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.34%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).