Chippewa vs Romanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Romanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Romanians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Romanian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,366,627 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Romanians.
Chippewa vs Romanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $48,445, a difference of 32.3%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $91,994, a difference of 30.4%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $60,063, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,632, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $41,663, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $48,445 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $111,243 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $91,994 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $50,244 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $60,063 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $41,663 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,632 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $102,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $108,609 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $64,142 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chippewa vs Romanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 46.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Chippewa vs Romanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 85.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chippewa vs Romanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Fair 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Good 83.0% |
Chippewa vs Romanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 48.3%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Chippewa vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Chippewa vs Romanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 62.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 41.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chippewa vs Romanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Romanian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |