Filipino vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Filipino
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Filipinos
Chickasaw
17.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,336,668 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 54.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 43.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 38.2% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 15.8% | 35.8% |
| Median | 14.3% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |