Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Chickasaw
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,651,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 26.1%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 9.8% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 65.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.4% | 88.9% |
Mean | 25.7% | 35.8% |
Median | 21.2% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |