Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Chickasaw
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,218,477 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 30.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 11.2% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.8% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 30.0% | 35.8% |
| Median | 20.6% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.9% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.0% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.8% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |