Immigrants from Italy vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Chickasaw
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,580,979 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 37.9%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 7.7% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 88.9% |
Mean | 28.7% | 35.8% |
Median | 15.6% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.1% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.2% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |