Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chickasaw
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
44.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,809,580 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 24.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 10.2% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 42.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 32.5% | 88.9% |
Mean | 21.6% | 35.8% |
Median | 19.8% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.12%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |