Alsatian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,698,712 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.446% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 446.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $32,345, a difference of 46.2%), median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $41,758, a difference of 32.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $71,697, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $59,383, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $44,003, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 43.9%), single father poverty (17.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 167.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 127.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 127.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 39.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (44.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households (61.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 72.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 47.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 84.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 81.1%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.25%), 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.9%).