Cambodian vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,638,941 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 43.6 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $32,345, a difference of 59.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $75,945, a difference of 50.6%), and median male earnings ($62,516 compared to $41,758, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $59,383, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $44,003, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 86.2%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 61.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 223.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 166.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 162.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 76.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (61.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 70.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 49.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 120.1%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 107.5%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.33%), 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 53.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 46.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.1%).