Pennsylvania German vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,319,312 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.720. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 128.5 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 30.8%), median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $41,758, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $75,945, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $31,489, a difference of 10.5%), median household income ($75,814 compared to $67,965, a difference of 11.6%), and median family income ($91,763 compared to $82,064, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 43.6%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 0.59%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 131.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 119.9%), and unemployment (4.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 38.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.64, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 53.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.8%).