Chippewa vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,256,247 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 21.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $32,345, a difference of 13.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $71,697, a difference of 11.6%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $31,489, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,539 compared to $67,965, a difference of 3.8%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $82,064, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 34.0%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 97.9%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 67.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.20 compared to 3.64, a difference of 13.6%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.7%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.66%).