Colville vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,103,268 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to a decrease of 57.8 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $31,489, a difference of 19.1%), per capita income ($38,047 compared to $32,345, a difference of 17.6%), and median male earnings ($48,516 compared to $41,758, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,094 compared to $67,965, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($85,792 compared to $82,064, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $75,945, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (24.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 70.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 66.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.14 compared to 3.64, a difference of 15.9%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 86.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 158.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.9%).