Guamanian/Chamorro vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,150,606 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.937. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.823% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 822.6 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $75,945, a difference of 33.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $71,697, a difference of 30.5%), and per capita income ($41,678 compared to $32,345, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $59,383, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $44,003, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 80.0%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 58.9%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 144.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 127.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 122.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 48.9%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.19%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.64, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%).