Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Cape Verdean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Cape Verdeans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cape Verdean Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,733,872 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.578. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Cape Verdeans.
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in median earnings ($40,287 compared to $44,640, a difference of 10.8%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,614, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $51,103, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $87,580, a difference of 4.3%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $91,848, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $39,935 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $91,848 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $75,848 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $44,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $51,103 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $38,614 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Poor $51,387 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $85,758 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $87,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $50,077 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 43.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 124.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 44.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.0%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (62.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 61.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 38.1% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 39.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 41.3% |
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 72.1%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 64.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 84.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 46.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 4.4% |
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 89.5%), college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 94.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 90.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 87.4% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 56.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 50.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 38.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chippewa vs Cape Verdean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.34%), female disability (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Cape Verdean |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |