Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Cape Verdean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Cape Verdeans
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cape Verdean Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,109,945 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.154% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 154.4 Cape Verdeans.
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,387, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $50,077, a difference of 7.3%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $87,580, a difference of 0.37%), median family income ($90,543 compared to $91,848, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $75,848, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $39,935 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $91,848 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $75,848 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $44,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $51,103 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $38,614 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Poor $51,387 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $85,758 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $87,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $50,077 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 55.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.1%), poverty (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Average 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 44.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 82.1% |
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 27.1%), married-couple households (43.7% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.32%), family households (62.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 61.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 38.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 39.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 41.3% |
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 47.0%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 84.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 46.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 15.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 4.4% |
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 64.7%), college, 1 year or more (56.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 93.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 90.8% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 87.4% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 56.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 50.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 38.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Iroquois vs Cape Verdean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Cape Verdean |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 3.0% |