Iroquois vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,172,585 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $104,796, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $118,056, a difference of 41.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $122,222, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $57,123, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $46,502, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 62.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 55.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 24.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 52.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.1%), family households (62.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 85.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 77.7%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 63.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 50.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.0%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%).