Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Vietnam
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Immigrants from Vietnam

Fair
Good
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,880
SOCIAL INDEX
66.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
138th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Vietnam Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,758,636 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Immigrants from Vietnam.
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Vietnam Communities

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $91,987, a difference of 23.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $106,417, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $100,535, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,153, a difference of 10.3%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $43,229, a difference of 10.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income
Income MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Fair
$43,229
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Excellent
$106,186
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Exceptional
$91,987
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Good
$47,282
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Good
$54,913
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Good
$40,153
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Exceptional
$55,562
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$100,535
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Exceptional
$106,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Excellent
$63,014
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Good
25.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 42.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Excellent
83.1%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 30.5%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.5%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.38, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
29.3%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 22.3%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
60.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Exceptional
23.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
8.6%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 77.0%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
88.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
83.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Poor
64.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Poor
58.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
14.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 41.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.55%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Iroquois vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisImmigrants from Vietnam
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%